Zac C.

Marvin A. interestingly, right answer, wrong execution. I put this in place ubt it kept coming up with the same "random" number. I ran it through claude and it figured out you guysa re using a container that resets to the same "random" defaults every run, so it gave me different code that does work even in that circumstance. It was interesting how claude could reverse engineer the problem!

ooo excellent, I will try that thank you!

next time I play with lindy will try it again and let you know

Marvin A. same problem on both of these - https://chat.lindy.ai/add-personality-test-682de925aa1532e240bf4173/tasks https://chat.lindy.ai/lead-outreacher-682e8c23d0ad62d6ec8b4539/tasks Had to add this instructino - "Send that row number +1 (so if you think its row 5, send row 6) and row information to the data to the next step and stop." to make it stop overwriting the wrong row

agreed...when I switched to sonnet the price seemed to be pretty similar...but yeah, opus killed my credits.

Using OPUS 4 on a complex prompt is a hot knife through butter...but WOW does it burn credits! It's a jet fighter of a model...